Why Abzena?
Trust our focused approach.
In our latest whitepaper, our cell line development experts explore two primary approaches —random integration and semi-targeted (or transposase) integration— and how they can differ in their impact on expression, variability, scalability, and regulatory approval.
Using real-world case studies, we demonstrate how well-optimized random integration methods can produce comparable—or better—titers, productivity, and stability. By focusing on proper vector design, host cell line selection, and robust screening strategies, random integration can yield high-performing clones efficiently.
Using side-by-side comparisons, we demonstrate that clones developed using random integration frequently exhibit higher expression levels, improved growth characteristics, and superior process robustness compared to those developed with semi-targeted (transposase) systems. Moreover, the flexibility of random integration avoids reliance on specific “landing pads” or proprietary transposon systems, reducing complexity and cost in development pipelines.
However, rather than declaring one approach categorically better, this whitepaper advocates for context-driven CLD decisions. It underscores that with a high-quality platform and process knowledge, random integration remains a powerful, scalable, and regulatory-friendly method. The findings empower drug developers to reconsider assumptions and embrace the method best suited for their molecule, timeline, and budget.
Key Takeaways: